Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Neither States Nor Markets

The Role of Economic Organization in Asian Development

Gary G. Hamilton

University of Washington

Robert Feenstra

University of California at Davis

Wongi Choe

University of Washington

Chung Ku Kim

University of Washington

Eun Mie Lim

University of Washington

This article shows that economic organization has independent and direct effects on the course of economic development. Most existing theories of economic development ignore the dynamic role of inter-firm interactions and, instead, stress state policies and macro-economic forces as the decisive factors creating a country's industrial structure. Our research shows that developing economies have emergent organizational dimensions that, once they become going concerns, create momentum and trajectory. Using South Korea and Taiwan as case studies, this article demonstrates that the divergent economic outcomes of these two countries can best be explained by emerging differences in the organization of economies.

Key Words: economic sociology • organizational sociology • sociology of development • the sociology of East Asia

International Sociology, Vol. 15, No. 2, 288-305 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580900015002009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International SociologyHome page
T.-H. Yang
Social Factors, Transaction Costs and Industrial Organization
International Sociology, July 1, 2007; 22(4): 435 - 461.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
C.-N. Chung
Institutional Transition and Cultural Inheritance: Network Ownership and Corporate Control of Business Groups in Taiwan, 1970s-1990s
International Sociology, March 1, 2004; 19(1): 25 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]