Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheppele, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Constitutional Negotiations

Political Contexts of Judicial Activism in Post-Soviet Europe

Kim Lane Scheppele

University of Pennsylvania

Constitutional courts in a number of new democracies have become very powerful institutions with a wide range of capacities. But how have they been able to achieve this power politically? This article examines the Hungarian and Russian constitutional courts in their political contexts and shows how these courts have both shaped the political environments in which they have worked and have been shaped by them. Rather than finding that the courts are an anti-democratic check on democratic governments, this analysis concludes that courts can be the strongest advocates of the demands of democratic citizenries against governments that stray from their promises. The theory of the `counter-majoritarian difficulty' developed to understand US judicial review, therefore, does not work well to explain the rise of the new constitutional courts.

Key Words: comparative courts • constitutionalism • democratic theory • judicial review

International Sociology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 219-238 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580903018001012


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Classical SociologyHome page
I.-P. Sahni
Max Weber's Sociology of Law: Judge as Mediator
Journal of Classical Sociology, May 1, 2009; 9(2): 209 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
J. T. Richardson
Religion, Constitutional Courts, and Democracy in Former Communist Countries
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 2006; 603(1): 129 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]