This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chung, C.-N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Institutional Transition and Cultural Inheritance

Network Ownership and Corporate Control of Business Groups in Taiwan, 1970s–1990s

National University of Singapore

Business groups are a prominent enterprise system in most East Asian and emerging economies. This article addresses an important but understudied issue – ownership and control of these large conglomerates. Studying the ownership structure of the top 100 Taiwanese business groups sheds light on the debate between the culturalists and the institutionalists. Culturalists claim family domination even in institutional changes while institutionalists suggest more dispersed and open shareholding after economic liberalization. The longitudinal analysis of group ownership across three time periods reveals a mixed structure. Although the family still controls most of the old, core groupmembers, new firms and joint ventures that are owned by multiple family groups rose significantly during the institutional transition of 1987–93. The evidence shows that organizational changes neither completely comply with emerging rules, nor do they hold on to existing cultural logics. Neither the culturalists nor the institutionalists have correctly predicted the metamorphosis. Rather, the concept of compromise strategy, which allows organizations to retain their core interests while at the same time respond to institutional constraints and/or incentives, provides a proper explanation.

Key Words: business groups • compromise strategy • institutional change • ownership • Taiwan

International Sociology, Vol. 19, No. 1, 25-50 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580904040919


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Okhmatovskiy Sources of Capital and Structures of Influence: Banks in the Russian Corporate Network International Sociology, December 1, 2005; 20(4): 427 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF]