This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lyon, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Globalizing Surveillance

Comparative and Sociological Perspectives

Queen’s University, Ontario

If surveillance was once thought of as primarily the domain of the nation-state, or of organizations such as firms within the nation-state, in the 21st century it must be considered in a broader context. Surveillance has to do with the rationalized control of information within modern organizations, and involves in particular processing personal data for the purposes of influence, management, or control. It also depends for its success on the involvement of its ‘data-subjects’. In countries of the global north, surveillance expanded with increasing rapidity after computerization from the 1970s onwards, a process that also enabled it to spread more readily to other areas, especially from workers and citizens to consumers and travellers. Since the 1980s, surveillance has become increasingly globalized, as populations become more mobile, and as social relations and transactions have stretched more elastically over time and space. Globalizing surveillance was also catalyzed by the events of 11 September 2001. However, surveillance processes occur differently in different cultural contexts, as do responses to them. Understanding comparatively the various modes of surveillance, understood sociologically, helps us grasp one of the key features of today’s world and also to see political and policy responses to it in perspective.

Key Words: globalization • late modernity • risk • surveillance

International Sociology, Vol. 19, No. 2, 135-149 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580904042897


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Hempel and E. Topfer The Surveillance Consensus: Reviewing the Politics of CCTV in Three European Countries European Journal of Criminology, March 1, 2009; 6(2): 157 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Wood The `Surveillance Society': Questions of History, Place and Culture European Journal of Criminology, March 1, 2009; 6(2): 179 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. A. Botello An Orchestration of Electronic Surveillance: A CCTV Experience in Mexico International Criminal Justice Review, December 1, 2007; 17(4): 325 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Wilson Australian Biometrics and Global Surveillance International Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2007; 17(3): 207 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. P. Hier, J. Greenberg, K. Walby, and D. Lett Media, communication and the establishment of public camera surveillance programmes in Canada Media Culture Society, September 1, 2007; 29(5): 727 - 751. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Broeders and G. Engbersen The Fight Against Illegal Migration: Identification Policies and Immigrants' Counterstrategies American Behavioral Scientist, August 1, 2007; 50(12): 1592 - 1609. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Brighenti Visibility: A Category for the Social Sciences Current Sociology, May 1, 2007; 55(3): 323 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Broeders The New Digital Borders of Europe: EU Databases and the Surveillance of Irregular Migrants International Sociology, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 71 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]