Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsui-Auch, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Bureaucratic Rationality and Nodal Agency in a Developmental State

The Case of State-Led Biotechnology Development in Singapore

Lai Si Tsui-Auch

Nanyang Technological University

Theorists in the sociology of development have extensively discussed the capacity of a developmental state to intervene in the industrialization process of a nation. Evans argued that state capacity could be enhanced through the securing of internal cohesiveness, for which the establishment of an effective, rule-following bureaucracy was the key. Chibber amended Evans’s view by arguing that bureaucratic rationality would lead to state cohesiveness only in the presence of disciplinary coordination by a ‘nodal agency’ which was endowed with power over other state agencies that might compete for scarce resources for national development. Based on a study of the state-led biotech development in Singapore, the author of this article makes two further amendments. First, a nodal agency, as shown by the Economic Development Board of Singapore, can maximize the coordination of industrial and technology policy by maintaining an interlocking directorship with other state agencies and externalizing its culture rather than exercising coercion over other state agencies. Second, bureaucratic rationality in the presence of a powerful nodal agency can be a double-edged sword that enables and inhibits technological development.

Key Words: Asian newly industrialized economies • entrepreneurship • industrial policy • knowledge economy • multinational corporations • organizational change management • psychological contract • research and development • technology policy

International Sociology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 451-477 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580904047367
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?