This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rus, A. Articles by Iglic, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Trust, Governance and Performance

The Role of Institutional and Interpersonal Trust in SME Development

University of Ljubljana, andrej.rus{at}guest.arnes.si

Hajdeja Igli

University of Ljubljana, hajdeja.iglic{at}fdv.uni-lj.si

This article explores the relationship between trust and control by investigating the direct and indirect effects of different types of trust on company performance. A survey of small and medium size firms in Slovenia and Bosnia-Herzegovina is used to demonstrate how the level of trust entrepreneurs have in institutions and business partners influences the choice of governance mechanisms that coordinate economic activities among actors. The article shows that the institutional environment in Slovenia generates more trust, which enables actors to base their business relationships on trust rather than contract. In addition, when actors rely on trust it is usually institutional trust rather than interpersonal trust. In contrast, Bosnia, with a weaker institutional environment, generates less trust, leading actors to base their economic relationships on contract. However, when trust is used in Bosnia as a basis of business relationships it is likely to be centred on interpersonal trust. These results have important implications for the understanding of the process by which trust affects economic performance. The use of institutional trust as a basis for a governance mechanism may lead to increased economic performance of companies due to the inclusive nature of sociability patterns and tie formation since institutions generalize trust beyond a specific set of exchange partners. The use of interpersonal trust may limit economic potential due to its reliance on strong ties embedded within cohesive groups marked with closure.

Key Words: Bosnia-Herzegovina • governance • institutions • interorganizational relations • organization theory • Slovenia • trust

International Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 371-391 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580905055481


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. W. L. Vlaar, F. A. J. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda On the Evolution of Trust, Distrust, and Formal Coordination and Control in Interorganizational Relationships: Toward an Integrative Framework Group Organization Management, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 407 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Tillmar and L. Lindkvist Cooperation Against All Odds: Finding Reasons for Trust where Formal Institutions Fail International Sociology, June 1, 2007; 22(3): 343 - 366. [Abstract] [PDF]