This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fraile, M. Articles by Ferrer, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Explaining the Determinants of Public Support for Cuts in Unemployment Benefits Spending across OECD Countries

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, marta{at}ceacs.march.es

Mariona Ferrer

Pompeu-Fabra University, mariona.ferrer{at}upf.edu

This article analyses comparative data for the last half of the 1990s to investigate the determinants of individual and cross-national variation in public support for cuts in unemployment benefits spending. The authors consider public opinion on unemployment benefits retrenchment as a product not only of individual-level characteristics but also of national-level features. With few exceptions, the latter features have been limited by previous studies to the institutional characteristics of welfare policies across countries operationalized in a superficial way: i.e. the type of welfare regime. This article proposes a more detailed operationalization of the institutional characteristics of welfare policies by considering cross-country variations in the generosity of unemployment protection. The authors also take into account a structural characteristic of the polities considered here: i.e. the seriousness of the unemployment problem. Even if the results are tentative, the authors believe they open the ‘black box of welfare types’ that until very recently has been the predominant explanation when accounting for aggregated variation in public opinion on welfare states.

Key Words: comparative public attitudes • public support for welfare state retrenchment • social policies

International Sociology, Vol. 20, No. 4, 459-481 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580905058327


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. M. Jaeger United But Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2009; 25(6): 723 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Busemeyer, A. Goerres, and S. Weschle Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries Journal of European Social Policy, July 1, 2009; 19(3): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. M. Jaeger Does Left-Right Orientation have a Causal Effect on Support for Redistribution? Causal Analysis with Cross-sectional Data Using Instrumental Variables Int. J. Public Opin. Res., September 1, 2008; 20(3): 363 - 374. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Mills, G. G. van de Bunt, and J. de Bruijn Comparative Research: Persistent Problems and Promising Solutions International Sociology, September 1, 2006; 21(5): 619 - 631. [Abstract] [PDF]