Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Sociology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inoue, K.
Right arrow Articles by Drori, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Global Institutionalization of Health as a Social Concern

Organizational and Discursive Trends

Keiko Inoue

World Bank, kinoue{at}stanfordalumni.org

Gili S. Drori

Stanford University, drori{at}stanford.edu

Drawing from sociological neoinstitutionalism, this article considers the emergence and evolution of the global health system. Tracing the dates of the founding of health-related international organizations shows a clear pattern of institutionalization over time. First, the article shows a clear trend of organizational structuration and expansion: with the oldest health-related international organizations tracing their origins to the 17th century, the global organizational field today includes some 2600 health-related organizations. Second, the field has clearly changed over time in the framing of health as a social concern: delineating the goals and aims of these health-related international organizations, the article reveals four general approaches to international health (as an act of charity, as a professional activity, as a means for development and as a basic human right) and a historic thematic shift from charity to human rights-based notions of health between 1650 and 1997. Such shifts are theorized within the framework of the neoinstitutional perspective.

Key Words: globalization • health • international organizations • neoinstitutional theory

International Sociology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 199-219 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0268580906061376


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
SOC POLHome page
A. H. Kimura
Who Defines Babies' "Needs"?: The Scientization of Baby Food in Indonesia
Soc. Pol., June 1, 2008; 15(2): 232 - 260.
[Full Text] [PDF]