This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Burns, T. R. Articles by Dietz, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

CULTURAL EVOLUTION: SOCIAL RULE SYSTEMS, SELECTION AND HUMAN AGENCY

Thomas Dietz

In this paper we outline a general evolutionary theory, which we suggest can provide a useful point of departure for the description and analysis of cultural and institutional dynamics. The paper defines culture and institutions as systems of social rules, produced and reproduced by human groups, and formulates the evolutionary dynamics of such rule systems. In the context of the resurgence of evolutionary thinking in the social sciences in the last decade, we distinguish between contemporary evolutionary approaches and earlier developmental approaches. By evolutionary we mean models of the generation of variety, transmission of information and the operation of selection and other processes (migration, distorted or incorrect knowledge transmission etc.) on the distribution of information within and between populations over time. The key units of information consists of social rules, the production, reproduction and transformation of which is the focus of the theory. In this scheme macro or population-level phenomena and structures are shaped by micro-level processes and in turn are the selective environment for the micro-level processes. Historical developments are seen as the result of complex contingencies rather than representing a tendency for key variables to move towards a static or dynamic Aristotelean `natural state'. In historical developments, human agents play a major role but often not in the ways they intend or anticipate.

International Sociology, Vol. 7, No. 3, 259-283 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/026858092007003001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Eder Cognitive Sociology and the Theory of Communicative Action: The Role of Communication and Language in the Making of the Social Bond European Journal of Social Theory, August 1, 2007; 10(3): 389 - 408. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Bandura Toward a Psychology of Human Agency Perspectives on Psychological Science, June 1, 2006; 1(2): 164 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Burns The Evolution of Parliaments and Societies in Europe: Challenges and Prospects European Journal of Social Theory, May 1, 1999; 2(2): 167 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. Rosa and T. Dietz Climate Change and Society: Speculation, Construction and Scientific Investigation International Sociology, December 1, 1998; 13(4): 421 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Truffer and G. Durrenberger Outsider Initiatives in the Reconstruction of the Car: The Case of Lightweight Vehicle Milieus in Switzerland Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 1997; 22(2): 207 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Strauss CULTURAL EVOLUTION: AN INTERACTIONIST PERSPECTIVE International Sociology, December 1, 1993; 8(4): 493 - 495.

				C. C. Jaeger THE CULTURAL EVOLUTION OF RATIONAL CHOICE International Sociology, December 1, 1993; 8(4): 497 - 503. [Abstract]